ShareGate Teams management

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback
  1. Integrate existing M365 sensitivity labels with Apricot sensitivity tags

    Would like to see integration between Apricot sensitivity tags and M365 sensitivity labels for sites & groups to allow more organizations to take full advantage of Apricot.

    The current Apricot sensitivity tags only exist within Apricot and are not the same, nor do they integrate/sync or play well with M365 sensitivity labels, even if you set both to the same choices. This prevents organizations that need to use M365 sensitivity labels from using many features of Apricot since the sensitivity labels cannot be completely turned off and even if they could, Apricot does not even read the existing M365 labels…

    9 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  06- Policies & Settings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  01- Activity  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Adding a link to the Team / SharePoint site in the Teams Bot notification

    Adding a link to the Team / SharePoint site in relation to the Teams Bot question would be really useful for the user to make an informed decision on.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  10- Teams Bot  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Add the ability to bulk delete or bulk restore on the Archive Page and support Filtering

    On the Archive page, I would like to be able to bulk delete archived teams. Currently I have to open each team indivudally in order to perform an action.

    I would like to be able to select say all the teams archived over 3 years ago and bulk delete them. Currently there is no filtering although sorting is possible.

    Thanks!

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  02- Archive  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Add European datacenter to free storage options

    The free option is nice, but brings with it a lot of pain due to the data locality.
    We could more easily get this through if there is an option to choose Europe as a base of operations

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  11- Other ideas  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Exclude service-account activity/ownership.

    Exclude service-account activity/ownership. Today I have a backup of my M365-platform including SharePoint, Teams and Groups using a service-account. That membership is counted in apricot as well as its backup-activity. it will even ask my service-account for purpose and will never report any orphans as my service-account is a counted owner..

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  06- Policies & Settings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  06- Policies & Settings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Allow manipulations of ShareGate Apricot features via API

    Currently functionality can only be performed by either the UI or the BOT. However in larger organizations, where automation is key, it would be useful to be able to include ShareGate Apricot administrative tasks in automation processes by calling ShareGate Apricot API's: (get - put - post - delete - patch)
    - Purpose
    - Sensitivity Labels
    - Orphaned teams
    - ...

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  11- Other ideas  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Add more group info into Owner emails to help them find it/review it

    Many times group owners do not know what workloads a group is used with based on only the group name, especially if it has been inactive. Also, many groups have very similar names. Adding which workload the group is used with (similar to the SP, Teams and Outlook icons on the manage screens) and the link to the connected site/team (if SharePoint or Teams) would be very helpful to the owners and reduce calls to admins to help them find where the group is used. Most users will not blindly click on a Delete button in an email without actually…

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  03- Communications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  03- Communications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  02- Archive  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Allow the ability to use Group Purpose and Group Sensitivity tagging independent of one another

    We would really like to use Group Purpose tagging to help out Admins filter on the Teams that they own. Out tenant has multiple subsidiaries with differing IT groups managing their own employees. The Group Purpose allows us to tag the groups for IT support, but we don't want to use the Group Sensitivity tagging as of right now.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  06- Policies & Settings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. Support tenants with more than 10 000 groups

    To support organizations with more than 10 000 Microsoft 365 groups which is currently a limitation.

    57 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    23 comments  ·  11- Other ideas  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi!

    In order to increase or remove this limitation I would like to know how many groups/teams are currently in your tenant.

    The feasibility is not the same if we talk about 20k groups, 100k groups or 1M groups.

    Thanks a lot for your help!

    Nathalie

  14. Ability to change the Sender's display name for email communications

    As of now, you can change the sender's email address but the display name in the email is still the admin's. It would be great to be able to create an account for this and be able to use it for both the email and display name.

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  03- Communications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. It would be great if this tool can have capability of moving channel from one team to the other within the same domain

    Right now, Sharegate Apricot and Micosoft doesnt have capability of moving teams channel from one team to the other. However as per microsoft they are working on it shows since last two years. There is a tool in the market that can do now. But since Apricot provide most of the admin features I think it would be great if it can also provide this capability.

    Refer below link for the tool in the market that offers that capability.
    https://agatsoftware.com/microsoft-teams-channel-management/

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  11- Other ideas  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  03- Communications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Secondary Notification for Inactive Teams

    Would it be possible to add a secondary notification option? For example if the initial inactive team threshold is 365 days. If a user says "Keep" they would get notified a second time in 90 days. That 90 days is the feature request in this case.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  03- Communications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. 48 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    13 comments  ·  11- Other ideas  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Alert admins when owners answers I don't know (Teams Purpose)

    The Teams Bot is working really well but it would be great if there was an option here for the owner to answer I Don't Know and then an admin can get an alert. The reason is that sometimes there are Teams created and the owner either has forgotten the use or inherited it and needs some help. Without the IDK option, some users just ignore the Bot.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  10- Teams Bot  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. Approval workflow for specific sensitivity labels

    Ability to setup an approval workflow when Owners select specific sensitivity labels (i.e. public Teams / Anyone shared links).
    The workflow would ask identified users to approve the label.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  06- Policies & Settings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base