Skip to content

ShareGate Teams management

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

209 results found

  1. Secondary Notification for Inactive Teams

    Would it be possible to add a secondary notification option? For example if the initial inactive team threshold is 365 days. If a user says "Keep" they would get notified a second time in 90 days. That 90 days is the feature request in this case.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Adding a link to the Team / SharePoint site in the Teams Bot notification

    Adding a link to the Team / SharePoint site in relation to the Teams Bot question would be really useful for the user to make an informed decision on.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Alert admins when owners answers I don't know (Teams Purpose)

    The Teams Bot is working really well but it would be great if there was an option here for the owner to answer I Don't Know and then an admin can get an alert. The reason is that sometimes there are Teams created and the owner either has forgotten the use or inherited it and needs some help. Without the IDK option, some users just ignore the Bot.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Add European datacenter to free storage options

    The free option is nice, but brings with it a lot of pain due to the data locality.
    We could more easily get this through if there is an option to choose Europe as a base of operations

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  02- Archive  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Approval workflow for specific sensitivity labels

    Ability to setup an approval workflow when Owners select specific sensitivity labels (i.e. public Teams / Anyone shared links).
    The workflow would ask identified users to approve the label.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Search on Teams Members in addition to Teams Names and Teams Owners

    Being able to search for the Teams a specific member is on would be very helpful. Especially when trying to keep Teams streamlined with only active/current employees and guests.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. It would be great if this tool can have capability of moving channel from one team to the other within the same domain

    Right now, Sharegate Apricot and Micosoft doesnt have capability of moving teams channel from one team to the other. However as per microsoft they are working on it shows since last two years. There is a tool in the market that can do now. But since Apricot provide most of the admin features I think it would be great if it can also provide this capability.

    Refer below link for the tool in the market that offers that capability.
    https://agatsoftware.com/microsoft-teams-channel-management/

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Customize who is getting the External Sharing reviews notifications

    For example, send the notification to a security governance team to review instead of Group Owners

    The limitation with this feature even though it is good is if an entrusted owner wanted to share confidential data out to a source we do not trust then it is only the owner that can approve this making it easy to bypass security policies.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. Send follow up email to inactive group owners after one of them completes action (archive/delete/keep).

    We keep having some confusion with our group owners when there is more than one owner and they all get the inactive group email with the Archive/Keep/Delete action buttons. This would be fixed by a follow up email to all owners "Joe User archived group ABC on 8/1/2021".

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. Add more group info into Owner emails to help them find it/review it

    Many times group owners do not know what workloads a group is used with based on only the group name, especially if it has been inactive. Also, many groups have very similar names. Adding which workload the group is used with (similar to the SP, Teams and Outlook icons on the manage screens) and the link to the connected site/team (if SharePoint or Teams) would be very helpful to the owners and reduce calls to admins to help them find where the group is used. Most users will not blindly click on a Delete button in an email without actually…

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  05- Manage  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Ability to hide the Delete button in email

    With the introduction of the delete button, owners of inactive groups can not only archive or keep their group, but also easily delete them. I would like the ability to hide that button. We've experienced already that deleted groups shouldn't have been deleted after all. Apparantly, not every owner understands that 'delete' really means 'delete'.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. Ability to choose preferred communication to reach out to owners

    It would be great if we could configure whether they get notified by email, by chatbot, or both (maybe chatbot first, then email if not response in X days, in case they are not using Teams).

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Customizable Settings for Archive/Support for Non-Apricot Archive

    For organizations that may be unable to use the built-in Apricot archive yet, it would be nice to have some more granular settings to control when/how the archive option is provided on end user communications and allow us to integrate our own archive processes, so we can still use Apricot as much as possible. For example, ability to toggle presentation of the archive option to end users on/off (preferably independent of whether storage is setup or not) , option to configure Apricot to either Archive using Apricot native mechanism or an external mechanism, ability to provide a URL where the…

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  02- Archive  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Integrate existing M365 sensitivity labels with Apricot sensitivity tags

    Would like to see integration between Apricot sensitivity tags and M365 sensitivity labels for sites & groups to allow more organizations to take full advantage of Apricot.

    The current Apricot sensitivity tags only exist within Apricot and are not the same, nor do they integrate/sync or play well with M365 sensitivity labels, even if you set both to the same choices. This prevents organizations that need to use M365 sensitivity labels from using many features of Apricot since the sensitivity labels cannot be completely turned off and even if they could, Apricot does not even read the existing M365 labels…

    12 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Allow manipulations of ShareGate Apricot features via API

    Currently functionality can only be performed by either the UI or the BOT. However in larger organizations, where automation is key, it would be useful to be able to include ShareGate Apricot administrative tasks in automation processes by calling ShareGate Apricot API's: (get - put - post - delete - patch)
    - Purpose
    - Sensitivity Labels
    - Orphaned teams
    - ...

    7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base