209 results found

1. Secondary Notification for Inactive Teams

   Would it be possible to add a secondary notification option? For example if the initial inactive team threshold is 365 days. If a user says "Keep" they would get notified a second time in 90 days. That 90 days is the feature request in this case.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  03- Communications  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

2. Adding a link to the Team / SharePoint site in the Teams Bot notification

   Adding a link to the Team / SharePoint site in relation to the Teams Bot question would be really useful for the user to make an informed decision on.

   5 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  10- Teams Bot  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

3. Alert admins when owners answers I don't know (Teams Purpose)

   The Teams Bot is working really well but it would be great if there was an option here for the owner to answer I Don't Know and then an admin can get an alert. The reason is that sometimes there are Teams created and the owner either has forgotten the use or inherited it and needs some help. Without the IDK option, some users just ignore the Bot.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  10- Teams Bot  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

4. Add European datacenter to free storage options

   The free option is nice, but brings with it a lot of pain due to the data locality.
   We could more easily get this through if there is an option to choose Europe as a base of operations

   6 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  02- Archive  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

5. Approval workflow for specific sensitivity labels

   Ability to setup an approval workflow when Owners select specific sensitivity labels (i.e. public Teams / Anyone shared links).
   The workflow would ask identified users to approve the label.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  06- Policies & Settings  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

6. Send alerts when a private channel becomes orphaned
   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  03- Communications  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

7. Search on Teams Members in addition to Teams Names and Teams Owners

   Being able to search for the Teams a specific member is on would be very helpful. Especially when trying to keep Teams streamlined with only active/current employees and guests.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  04- Dashboard  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

8. Modify the connection method for ShareGate Apricot
   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  06- Policies & Settings  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

9. It would be great if this tool can have capability of moving channel from one team to the other within the same domain

   Right now, Sharegate Apricot and Micosoft doesnt have capability of moving teams channel from one team to the other. However as per microsoft they are working on it shows since last two years. There is a tool in the market that can do now. But since Apricot provide most of the admin features I think it would be great if it can also provide this capability.

   Refer below link for the tool in the market that offers that capability.
   https://agatsoftware.com/microsoft-teams-channel-management/

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  11- Other ideas  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

10. Customize who is getting the External Sharing reviews notifications

    For example, send the notification to a security governance team to review instead of Group Owners

    The limitation with this feature even though it is good is if an entrusted owner wanted to share confidential data out to a source we do not trust then it is only the owner that can approve this making it easy to bypass security policies.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  03- Communications  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

11. Send follow up email to inactive group owners after one of them completes action (archive/delete/keep).

    We keep having some confusion with our group owners when there is more than one owner and they all get the inactive group email with the Archive/Keep/Delete action buttons. This would be fixed by a follow up email to all owners "Joe User archived group ABC on 8/1/2021".

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  03- Communications  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

12. email notification for categorization
    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  10- Teams Bot  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

13. Add more group info into Owner emails to help them find it/review it

    Many times group owners do not know what workloads a group is used with based on only the group name, especially if it has been inactive. Also, many groups have very similar names. Adding which workload the group is used with (similar to the SP, Teams and Outlook icons on the manage screens) and the link to the connected site/team (if SharePoint or Teams) would be very helpful to the owners and reduce calls to admins to help them find where the group is used. Most users will not blindly click on a Delete button in an email without actually reviewing the connected site contents.

    Many times group owners do not know what workloads a group is used with based on only the group name, especially if it has been inactive. Also, many groups have very similar names. Adding which workload the group is used with (similar to the SP, Teams and Outlook icons on the manage screens) and the link to the connected site/team (if SharePoint or Teams) would be very helpful to the owners and reduce calls to admins to help them find where the group is used. Most users will not blindly click on a Delete button in an email without actually… more

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  03- Communications  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

14. Reference the previous owner of the Team when actioning the items
    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  05- Manage  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

15. Ability to hide the Delete button in email

    With the introduction of the delete button, owners of inactive groups can not only archive or keep their group, but also easily delete them. I would like the ability to hide that button. We've experienced already that deleted groups shouldn't have been deleted after all. Apparantly, not every owner understands that 'delete' really means 'delete'.

    5 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  03- Communications  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

16. Ability to choose preferred communication to reach out to owners

    It would be great if we could configure whether they get notified by email, by chatbot, or both (maybe chatbot first, then email if not response in X days, in case they are not using Teams).

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  03- Communications  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

17. Customizable Settings for Archive/Support for Non-Apricot Archive

    For organizations that may be unable to use the built-in Apricot archive yet, it would be nice to have some more granular settings to control when/how the archive option is provided on end user communications and allow us to integrate our own archive processes, so we can still use Apricot as much as possible. For example, ability to toggle presentation of the archive option to end users on/off (preferably independent of whether storage is setup or not) , option to configure Apricot to either Archive using Apricot native mechanism or an external mechanism, ability to provide a URL where the Archive button on inactive emails should redirect end users if external archive is configured. This would allow us to send them to a page to give them additional guidance on archiving, collect additional info and/or give them way to request archive (ticketing system). For example, we may need to know how long the data needs to be retained. If Apricot could still keep track of the fact that the end user has decided the site should be archived, even if we are not using Apricot native archive, that would be helpful so we could see a list of sites that need to be archived outside of Apricot.

    For organizations that may be unable to use the built-in Apricot archive yet, it would be nice to have some more granular settings to control when/how the archive option is provided on end user communications and allow us to integrate our own archive processes, so we can still use Apricot as much as possible. For example, ability to toggle presentation of the archive option to end users on/off (preferably independent of whether storage is setup or not) , option to configure Apricot to either Archive using Apricot native mechanism or an external mechanism, ability to provide a URL where the… more

    5 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  02- Archive  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

18. Integrate existing M365 sensitivity labels with Apricot sensitivity tags

    Would like to see integration between Apricot sensitivity tags and M365 sensitivity labels for sites & groups to allow more organizations to take full advantage of Apricot.

    The current Apricot sensitivity tags only exist within Apricot and are not the same, nor do they integrate/sync or play well with M365 sensitivity labels, even if you set both to the same choices. This prevents organizations that need to use M365 sensitivity labels from using many features of Apricot since the sensitivity labels cannot be completely turned off and even if they could, Apricot does not even read the existing M365 labels so it limits use of Apricot for even basic visibility/reporting as far as sensitivity.

    Some organizations need to use M365 sensitivity labels for consistency across Teams, Communication Sites and other workloads which are not covered by Apricot. The M365 labels are integrated into the site/team provisioning screens and can enforce that users must select the sensitivity at the time they create the team/site (instead of after the fact) and users are already trained and familiar with this process (same as it's predecessor, site classifications). Turning on sensitivity tags in Apricot will ask them a second time and can also cause potential issues/mismatches/incorrect settings. M365 labels also give users ability to be able to change the label if their needs change, without requiring IT intervention, which is not an option with Apricot sensitivity tags.

    Would like to see integration between Apricot sensitivity tags and M365 sensitivity labels for sites & groups to allow more organizations to take full advantage of Apricot.

    The current Apricot sensitivity tags only exist within Apricot and are not the same, nor do they integrate/sync or play well with M365 sensitivity labels, even if you set both to the same choices. This prevents organizations that need to use M365 sensitivity labels from using many features of Apricot since the sensitivity labels cannot be completely turned off and even if they could, Apricot does not even read the existing M365 labels… more

    12 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  06- Policies & Settings  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

19. Allow manipulations of ShareGate Apricot features via API

    Currently functionality can only be performed by either the UI or the BOT. However in larger organizations, where automation is key, it would be useful to be able to include ShareGate Apricot administrative tasks in automation processes by calling ShareGate Apricot API's: (get - put - post - delete - patch)
    - Purpose
    - Sensitivity Labels
    - Orphaned teams
    - ...

    7 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  11- Other ideas  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

20. set up a ruleset that will automatically tag teams and groups based on these specific rules.
    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  06- Policies & Settings  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close