Dawn Bartnicki

My feedback

  1. 18 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Dawn Bartnicki commented  · 

    This would be helpful! When using the copy structure option, Sharegate should be able to change the settings for columns like making them not required and allowing fill in choices, so that options will migrate accurately.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Dawn Bartnicki commented  · 

    I also agree this improvement would be very helpful. If Sharegate could clear the required flag on columns, do the copy, then restore the flag.

    Dawn Bartnicki supported this idea  · 
  2. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Dawn Bartnicki commented  · 

    When using the copy content option the workflows on the library are not disabled by Sharegate. This creates an issue if I only want to copy some items over and not the structure of the library/site, but do not want the workflow to run. To handle this I would have to manually disable the workflow. This isn't ideal because then it appears I modified the workflow. Many site owners do not like this. Having the ability to select an option to disable workflows while migrating would be very helpful.

    I am aware this happens with copy structure, however I did not learn this did not happen with copy content until I copied several hundred completed requests, only to have an approval workflow kick off on all of them.

  3. 14 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Dawn Bartnicki commented  · 

    Please bring this option back! My list of connections is getting rather long.

    Dawn Bartnicki supported this idea  · 
  4. 63 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Hi everyone,

    Lately we decided to shift most of our energy towards migrating, managing and adopting Office 365. When we create new features, we make sure they also work with SharePoint on-premise (if possible), but we are not planning on developing more options of features specifically for on-premise at the moment.

    I’ll keep the suggestion open and our ears are still open to new comments.

    Thank you,

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Dawn Bartnicki commented  · 

    The ability to preserve list IDs is an important option. It would be nice it there was an option to do this as needed, since it doesn't always matter. In some cases we have lists that rely on the item ID. Having that change during migration becomes a huge problem. I've seen the workaround, but that only works in limited situations.

    Dawn Bartnicki supported this idea  · 
  5. 28 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Dawn Bartnicki supported this idea  · 
  6. 24 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Dawn Bartnicki supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Dawn Bartnicki commented  · 

    The ability to see hidden objects, like lists, custom files, workflows would be very helpful

  7. 43 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Dawn Bartnicki supported this idea  · 
  8. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Dawn Bartnicki supported this idea  · 
  9. 8 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Dawn Bartnicki supported this idea  · 
  10. 7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Dawn Bartnicki supported this idea  · 
  11. 166 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Hi everyone,

    It’s been a while since this suggestion has been updated so I just want to let you know that after re-evaluation, we still not planning on adding such a feature in the near future.

    We will continue to read your comments so don’t hesitate to send in more.

    Thanks again for sharing your feedback.

    Regards,

    Dawn Bartnicki supported this idea  · 
  12. 193 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Dawn Bartnicki supported this idea  · 
  13. 222 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Dawn Bartnicki supported this idea  · 
  14. 151 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Dawn Bartnicki supported this idea  · 
  15. 130 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    We feel like our migration experience is quite good right now and we don’t plan on doing custom rules and filters for now.

    Some of those can already be done using PowerShell, SharePoint views and other means.

    We will eventually reevaluate this once we advance further in our roadmap.

    Dawn Bartnicki supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base