Raquel Meyers
My feedback
3 results found
-
131 votes
Hi everyone,
Since we want to be transparent regarding our roadmap, I just wanted to do a quick update to say that even though we are not declining this idea, we are not planning on adding metadata reporting in the near future. We’ll keep you informed if and when we start working on it.
Thank you,
An error occurred while saving the comment Raquel Meyers
supported this idea
·
-
274 votes
This is not currently in our plan to allow our users to compare two environments.
We might do it in the future, possibly starting with permission as it seems like it would be the most useful part on security level.
Raquel Meyers
supported this idea
·
-
197 votes
Since the ability to schedule reports has been included for a while now and with the upcoming feature to automatically export reports into a SP library (see: https://feedback.sharegate.com/forums/912880/suggestions/17768698), I was wondering if this suggestion will still be needed?
What are your thoughts on this?
Raquel Meyers
supported this idea
·
This is both a migration and housekeeping issue for me.
For Migration: understanding where site columns and content types or term sets are actually used.
For house keeping: I would ideally be able to identify unused terms/term sets in the term store. The term store has an ability to grow like a wild animal with rouge unused terms!