Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 14 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  ShareGate Apricot Suggestions » 10- Teams Bot  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  2. 10 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  ShareGate Apricot Suggestions » 10- Teams Bot  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 57 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Hi!

    After an investigation, we have a secure plan to add the logo of your company inside the email to owners.

    We’re able to use images (squareLogo or BannerLogo) directly from the Branding set in your organization’s Azure Active Directory sign-in page.

    https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/fundamentals/customize-branding

    Before going further, I would like to know if the branding is already set in your environment and if that solution answer the need of this request (Logo only).

    In the meantime, I want to inform you that we’re going to add the Teams Chatbot communication mode for the Inactive policy. We found out that owners report less the bot as spam than email.

    Your feedback is really appreciated, thanks a lot!

    Nathalie

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  5. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  6. 7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  7. 16 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  8. 17 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  9. 42 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  10. 47 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  11. 47 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  12. 62 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Hello everyone,

    After a review of our roadmap, this suggestion is not a high priority at the moment.

    With all the improvements that were done to the SharePoint PnP Modernization framework (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sharepoint/dev/transform/modernize-userinterface-site-pages) over the last year, we feel like this is a solid alternative right now to convert classic pages to modern ones so we decided to put our efforts in adding more migration capabilities (Teams migration coming soon) to our tool instead.

    We’ll keep the suggestion open and will monitor the comments and feedback and will review it in the future.

    Thank you,

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  13. 60 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base